How To Flashing zync q8

keyword : How To Flashing zync q8 for bootloop , How To Flashing zync q8 for softbrick , How To Flashing zync q8 for hardbrick , How To Flashing zync q8 Error Camera , How To Flashing zync q8 blank screen , How To Flashing zync q8 lost password , How To Flashing zync q8 stuck logo , How To Flashing zync q8 new 2017. How To Flashing zync q8 repair phone.

DOWNLOAD FILE via Googledrive HERE

Download one of the above file:

How To Flashing zync q8

we’ve all heard these stories: people that live together have their periodstogether. an average menstrual cycle lasts around 28days: it starts with shedding built-up tissue in the womb, then prepping for pregnancy again. but one person might have a relatively longcycle, where someone else has a shorter cycle -- and they fluctuate month to month. so what’s the scientific basis for menstrualcycles syncing up … or is it just a myth? the first publication about this phenomenonin humans was in 1971, in the scientific journal nature.

psychologist martha mcclintock was supposedlyinspired by what she noticed as an undergraduate at a women’s school: all of her close friends seemed to get theirperiods at the same time. so, she did a study, and surveyed 135 studentsin a dorm at her alma mater, wellesley college. three times during the academic year, sheasked them for information: when their last two periods were, and who they were hangingout with. then, mcclintock analyzed these data to see how menstrual cycles changed in close friend groups. in october, near the start of the school year,she found that groups of friends had cycles that were off by an average of 6.4 days.

by april, groups of friends had periods closertogether -- only about 4.6 days apart. so it seemed like their menstrual cycles weresyncing up, and this phenomenon was dubbed the mcclintock effect, though it’s moreformally known as menstrual synchrony. but the driving force was still a mystery. some researchers, including mcclintock, hypothesizedthat pheromones were involved. pheromones are chemical substances that arereleased by an animal and detected by others in the same species, causing a behavioralor physiological reaction. some animals use them to communicate, andthey’re common in lots of social insects, like ants or bees.

a couple studies in the late 1970s and 80s,including experiments by mcclintock, looked into menstruation and pheromones in some mammals, like, rats, hamsters, and two non-human primates. most of these studies involved groups of around2 to 5 animals. their menstrual cycles seemed to align ifthey were breathing the same air, so maybe airborne pheromones were involved. but researchers in the late 1990s and early2000s tried to repeat some of the rat and hamster studies, and weren’t able to reproducethe results. without consistent findings, we can’t reallyknow if menstrual synchrony exists in mammals, or if it’s caused by pheromones.

not to mention, those animals and humans aren’tthe same. for one thing, we still don’t really evenknow if humans make pheromones. but some researchers have conducted humanstudies to try and replicate mcclintock’s initial findings. throughout the 1990s, a team of psychologistssurveyed close-knit groups of women, including college students in dorms, coworkers, mothers and daughters, and lesbian couples living together. sometimes menstrual synchrony occurred, andsometimes it didn’t. even as recent as 2006, scientists haven’tbeen able to show that the mcclintock effect is a definite thing, or pinpoint potentialcauses.

plus, several researchers have re-analyzedmcclintock’s initial study, and found some problems with her methods. one researcher, for example, suggested thathow the data were collected and analyzed could’ve exaggerated the lack of synchrony at the beginningof the study. like, if someone had their period just beforedata collection started, their next cycle would be in 28-ish days. so if someone had had their period right after data collection started, it would have seem'd like there was a whole month between those cycles,rather than just a couple of days. another team redid the statistical analysis,and suggested that the shift from 6.4 to 4.6

days could’ve happened by chance. any miscalculations or extra data points ina small study can make a huge difference when it comes to finding statistically significantdata. it’s been years since the last publishedstudy on menstrual synchrony, and the inconclusive results seem to suggest that it’s just a coincidence. so why do lots of people still swear thatthis thing exists? it probably comes down to our psychologicalperception. since different people have different menstrualcycles, they might not exactly synchronize. but they can phase in and out of sync.

it’s like when you’re stopped at a redlight, and you notice your turn signal starts blinking in sync with the car in front ofyou: if you wait for a little bit, you’ll phaseout of sync. and if you wait even longer, then you’ll be blinking in unison again. so maybe with a relatively short study onmenstrual cycles -- like seven or eight months in mcclintock’s study -- it might seem likethere’s synchrony. overall, it seems like the mcclintock effectjust doesn’t have enough conclusive research to back it up... but it does show us that a good science experimentisn’t just about proving or disproving something.

it’s about checking your biases, designingwell-controlled studies that are reproducible by other scientists, being careful with yourstatistics, and always asking new questions. thanks for watching this episode of scishow,which was brought to you by our patrons on patreon. if you want to help support this show, justgo to patreon.com/scishow. and don’t forget to go to youtube.com/scishowand subscribe!